Классические и альтернативные модели в лекарственной токсикологии
Аннотация
Даны генетически обусловленные и экспериментальные модели для оценки острой и хронической токсичности фармакологических веществ, общетоксического действия ксенобиотиков, специальных средств защиты. Приводятся стандартизованные и альтернативные модели оценки острой и хронической токсичности, альтернативные батареи тестов и основные стратегии токсикокинетики, токсикопротеомики, токсикогеномики, а также подходы к компьютерному моделированию токсичности.
Список литературы
1. Каркищенко Н.Н. Основы биомоделирования. - М.: Изд-во ВПК, 2004.
2. Руководство по экспериментальному (доклиническому) изучению новых фармакологических веществ / Под общей редакцией чл.-корр. РАМН, проф. Р.У.Хабриев. - 2-изд., перераб. и доп. - М.: ОАО Издательство «Медицина», 2005. - 832 с.
3. Balls M. & Fentem J.H. (1993). The on-going process to replace the LD50 test. Human Innovations and alternatives 7, 544-547.
4. Balls M. (1991). Why modification of the LD50 test will not be enough. // Laboratory Animals 25, 198-206.
5. Borenfreud E., Puerner J. (1984). A simple quantitative procedure using monolayer cultures for citotoxicity assays (HTD/NR-90). // Journal of Tissue Culture Methods 9, 7-9.
6. Borenfreud E., Puerner J. (1985). Toxicity determination in vitro by morphological alternations and neutral red absorption. // Toxicology Letters 24, 119-124.
7. Clemedson C., McFarlane-Abdulla E., Andersson M., Barile F.A., Calleja M.C., Chesné C., Clothier R.,Cottin M., Curren R., Daniel-Szolgay E., Dierickx P., Ferro M., Fiskesjö G., Garza-Ocanas L., Gómez-Lechón M.J., Gülden M., Isomaa B., Janus J. et al. (1996) MEIC evaluation of acute systemic toxicity: Part I. Methodology of 68 in vitro assays used to test the first 30 reference chemicals. // ATLA 24, 251-272.
8. Dierickx P. (1989). Cytotoxicity testing of 114 compounds by the determination of the protein content in Hep G2 cell cultures. // Toxicology in Vitro 3, 189-193.
9. Executive Summary. ATLA 33, Suppl. 1, 7-18, 2005.
10. EEC (1967) Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labeling of dangerous substances. // Official Journal of the European Economic Community 196, 1-98.
11. Genshow E., Spielmann H., Scholz G., Seiler A., Brown N., Piersma A., Brady M., Clemann N.,Huuskonen H., Paillard F., Brmer S., Becker K. (2002) The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro embryotoxicity tests: results of the definitive phase and evaluation of prediction models. // ATLA 30, 151-176.
12. Gribaldo L., Gennari A., Blackburn K., Clemedson C., Deguercy A., Meneguz A., Pfaller W., Ruhdel I. Acute Toxicity. // ATLA 33 Suppl. 1, p.27-34, 2005.
13. Heimann R., Rice R.H. (1983). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon toxicity and induction of metabolism in cultivated esophageal and epidermal keratinocytes. // Cancer Research 43, 4856.
14. ICCVAM (2001). Report of the International Workshop on In Vitro Methods for Assessing Acute Systemic Toxicity, NIH Publication No. 01-4499, 370pp. Research Trianglee Park. NC. USA: NIEHS. Website <http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/methods/invidocs/finalall.pdf> (Accessed 10.2.05).
15. Jansen R.C., Nap J.P., Mlynarova L. (2002). Errors in genomics and proteomics. // Nature Biotechnology 20, 19.
16. Kangas L., Gronroos M., Nieminen A.L. (1984). Bioluminescence of cellular ATP: a new method for evaluation cytotoxicity agents in vitro. // Medical Biology 62, 338-343.
17. Liebsch M., Curren R., Fentem J. (2001). Guidance Document on Using In Vitro Data to Estimate In Vivo Starting Doses for Acute Toxicity. NIH Publication 01-4500. Web site http//iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/methods/invidocs/guidance/iv_guide.pdf. Research Triangle Park, NC, USA: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Accessed 8.10.02).
18. Liebsch M., Spielman H. (1995). Balb/c 3T3 cytotoxicity test. In Methods and Molecular Biology, Vol. 43, In Vitro Toxicity testing Protocols (ed. S.O'Hare, C.K.Atterwill), pp. 177-187. Totowa, NJ, USA: Humana Press.
19. Lowry O.H., Rosebrough N.J., Farr A.L., Randall R.J. (1951). Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent title. // J of Biological Chemistry 193, 265-275.
20. Nicholson A., Sandler J., Seidle An evaluation of the US High Production Volume (HPV) Chemical-testing Programme: A Study in (Ir)Relevance, Redundancy and Retro Thinking. // ATLA 32, Suppl. 1А, 335-341, 2004.
21. OECD (1987). OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals No. 401: Acute Oral Toxicity (Deleted in 2002), 7pp. Paris, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
22. OECD (1995). Guidence Document for the Development of OECD GuideLines for Testing of Chemicals. Environmental Monographs No. 76, OECD, Paris, 1993, reprinted 1995. 28pp. Paris, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Website http://www.oecd.org/document/30/0,2340,en_2649_34377_1916638_1_1_1_1,00.html (Accessed 30/09/04).
23. OECD (2000). Environmental Health and Safety Monograph Series on Testing and Assessment No. 19: Guidance Document on the Recognition Assessment and Use of Clinical Signs as Human Endpoints for Experimental Animals Used in Safety Evaluation, 39pp. Paris, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
24. OECD (2001). OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals No. 420: Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Procedure, 14pp. Paris, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
25. OECD (2001). OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals No. 423: Acute Oral Toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method, 14pp. Paris, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
26. OECD (2001). OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals No. 425: Acute Oral Toxicity - Up-and-Down Procedure, 26pp. Paris, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
27. OECD (2004). Draft Test Guidline on Acute Toxicity - Fixed Dose Procedure, 24pp. Paris, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
28. OECD Guidelines for the testing of Chemicals. // ATLA 33, Suppl. 1, 223-227, 2005.
29. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2002). OECD Guidelines for the testing of Chemicals. Paris, France: OECD.
30. Prieto P., Clemedson C., Meneguz A., Pfaller W., Sauer U.G., Westmoreland C. Subacute and Subchronic Toxicity. // ATLA 33, Suppl. 1, 109-116, 2005.
31. Schrattenholz A. (2004). Proteomics: how to control highly dynamic patterns of millions of molecules and interpret changes correctly? Drug Dicovery Today - Technologies 1, in press.
32. Schrattenholz A., Klemm M., Cahill M. Potential of Comprehensive Toxico-proteomics:Quantitative and Differential Mining of Functional Proteoms from Native Samples. // ATLA 32, Suppl. 1A, 123-131, 2004.
33. Schulte C., Nagel R. (1994). Testing acute toxicity in the embryo of zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio, as an alternative to the acute fish test: preliminary results. // ATLA 22, 12-19.
34. Shrivatsava R., Delomenie C., Chevalier A., et al. (1992). Comparison of in vivo acute lethal potency and in vitro cytotoxicity of 48 chemicals. // Cell Biology and Toxicology 8, 157-170.
35. Shrivatsava R., John G.W., Rispat G., et al. (1991). Can the in vivo maximum tolerated dose be predicted using in vitro techniques? A working hypothesis. // ATLA 19, 393-402.
36. Spielman H., Genshow E., Liebsch M., Halle W. (1999). Determination of the starting dose for acute oral toxicity (LD50) testing in the Up and Down Procedure (UDP) from cytotoxicity data. // ATLA 27, 957-966.
37. Spielman H., Liebsch M. (1992). INVITOX Protocol No. 46: Balb/c 3T3 NRU Cytotoxicity Test. European Commission DG-JRC, ECVAM, SIS Database. Web site <http://ecvam-sis.jrc.it> (Accessed 30.9.04).
38. Spielman H., Liebsch M., Kalweit S., et al. (1996). Results of a validation study in Germany in two in vitro alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test, the HET-CAM test and the 3T3 NRU cytotoxicity test. ATLA 24, 741-758.
39. Spielmann H., Genshow E., Liebbsch M., Halle W. (1999) Determination he starting dose for acute oral toxicity (LD50) testing in the Up and Down Procedure (UDP) from cytotoxicity data. // ATLA 27, 957-966.
40. Schulte C., Nagel R. (1994). Testing acute toxicity in the embryo of zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio, as an alternative to the acute fish test: preliminary results. // ATLA 22, 12-19.
41. Sveden O.3-rd European congress of toxicologic pathology, 2005, Copengagen, Denmark.
42. Trevan J.W. (1927). The error of determination of toxicity. Proceedings of the Royal Society (London). Series B 101, 483-514.
43. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN/ECE) (2003). Globally Harmonised System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS), 6pp. New York, NY, USA, and Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations.
44. US Environmental Protection Agency (2000). The Use of Structure-Activity Relationships (SAR) in the High Production Volume Chemical Challenge Programme. Washington, DC, USA: US EPA (Accessed 8.12.02).
45. US Environmental Protection Agency (2001). Supplemental Acute Toxicity Protocol. Web site http://www.epa.gov./chemrtk /toxprtcl.htm. Washington, DC, USA: EPA (Accessed 8.12.02).
46. US Environmental Protection Agency (2002). Chemical Right to Know. Web site http://www.epa.gov./chemrtk/viewsrch.htm. Washington, DC, USA: EPA (Accessed 8.12.02).
47. US Environmental Protection Agency (2002). Ecological Structure Activity Relationships. Web site http://www.epa.gov./opptintr/newchems/21ecosar.htm. Washington, DC, USA: EPA (Accessed 8.12.02).
48. US National Toxicology Program Interagency Committee for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (2001). Report of the International Workshop on In Vitro Methods for Assessing Acute Systemic Toxicity, 389pp. NIH Publication 01-4499. Web site http//iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/methods/invidocs/guidance/iv_guide.htm. Research Triangle Park, NC, USA: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Accessed 8.10.02).
49. Van der Heuvel, M.J., Clark, D.G., Fielder, R.J., Koundakjian, P.P., Olivier, G.J.A., Pelling, D., Tomlinson, N.J., & Walker, A.P. (1990). The international validation of a fixed-dose procedure as an alternative to the classical LD50 test. Food and Chemical Toxicology 28, 469-482.
50. Wakuri S., Izumi J., Sasaki K., Tanaka N., Ono H. (1993). Cytotoxicity study of 32 MEIC chemicals by colony formation and ATP assays. Toxicity in Vitro 7, 517-521.
51. Zbinden G. & Flury-Roversi M. (1981). Significance of the LD50 test for the toxicological evaluation of chemical substances. Archives of Toxicology 47, 77-99.
52. Zuang V., Alonso M.A., Botham P.A., Eskes C., Fentem J., Liebsch M., Johannes J.M. van de Sandt Skin Irritation and Corrosion. ATLA 33, Suppl. 1, 35-46, 2005.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Каркищенко Н.Н. Классические и альтернативные модели в лекарственной токсикологии. БИОМЕДИЦИНА. 2006;1(4):1-23.
Просмотров:
313
Послать статью по эл. почте 
